[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 483: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/bbcode.php on line 112: preg_replace(): The /e modifier is no longer supported, use preg_replace_callback instead
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4772: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4774: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4775: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/includes/functions.php on line 4776: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at [ROOT]/includes/functions.php:3887)
Council of Elrond • View topic - Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Moderator: Thorsten the Traveller

Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Bandobras Took » Mon Aug 16, 2010 1:18 pm

Remember, NetRep rulings are official. This does not necessarily mean they are correct.

You probably aren't playing Fallen Wizards .
User avatar
Bandobras Took
Non-voting member
 
Posts: 2309
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:30 pm

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby marcos » Mon Aug 16, 2010 3:12 pm

aye
User avatar
marcos
 
Posts: 2010
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:41 pm
Location: Córdoba, Argentina

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Thorsten the Traveller » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:27 pm

Agreed.

2 things:
- I'd like to hear some cons (other than it being against official rule).
- I don't think this will have important effects on game play, so I don't share those with big ilusions about it.
Stone-age did not end because man ran out of rocks.
User avatar
Thorsten the Traveller
Chairman
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Tilburg, Netherlands

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Shapeshifter » Mon Aug 16, 2010 5:56 pm

Aye.

To give the rules gurus (netrep team) a chance to comment on this let's either put this thing in the general/rules section or give them rights to post here. This will be the first task for the experts (see this ).
Do we have to vote on whom we shall invite?
User avatar
Shapeshifter
Council Member
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Bandobras Took » Mon Aug 16, 2010 7:59 pm

Sauron is already commenting on CoE issues in the general forum. :)

I'd prefer to keep this thread strictly for the voting.

We could start a parallel thread in the General Forum.

By the way, I'll add my own "aye" to this. :)



A previous NetRep team already suggested that the rule be given erratum, but nothing came of it due to the generally lethargic Erratum process.
Remember, NetRep rulings are official. This does not necessarily mean they are correct.

You probably aren't playing Fallen Wizards .
User avatar
Bandobras Took
Non-voting member
 
Posts: 2309
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:30 pm

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Jose-san » Wed Aug 18, 2010 10:08 am

Definitely Aye!
User avatar
Jose-san
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 2:22 pm
Location: Valencia, Spain

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Bandobras Took » Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:11 pm

We have 5 agreed; that would be enough for a revised erratum process such as the one I proposed elsewhere.

We need one more for the current erratum process, don't we (two thirds)?
Remember, NetRep rulings are official. This does not necessarily mean they are correct.

You probably aren't playing Fallen Wizards .
User avatar
Bandobras Took
Non-voting member
 
Posts: 2309
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:30 pm

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Vastor Peredhil » Sat Aug 21, 2010 6:35 pm

Back from holiday . . .

getting to work

Aye to this one for sure

it was a fuck-up the way it was before
Vastor Peredhil
Council Member
 
Posts: 861
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:46 am
Location: Kempen (Niederrhein) Germany

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Bandobras Took » Sat Aug 21, 2010 7:48 pm

Either by old or new methods, then, this has the minimum number of required "aye" votes.

We need to either send it to the mailing list for ratification or figure out a new erratum process. :)
Remember, NetRep rulings are official. This does not necessarily mean they are correct.

You probably aren't playing Fallen Wizards .
User avatar
Bandobras Took
Non-voting member
 
Posts: 2309
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:30 pm

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Frodo » Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:27 pm

I was always displeased with the way the cards playable on auto-attacks had been ruled, because it made it VERY DIFFICULT for players to remember, and not at all intuitive. So I would give my AYE to opening this revision up for debate.

However, it was my understanding that the rules people had good reasons for deciding this, and I want to hear what they were. Or maybe there only reasons were to keep tradition with a strict interpretation of cards? If the second, I don't mind breaking tradition.

--Frodo
User avatar
Frodo
 
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:09 am
Location: NYC, NY

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Bandobras Took » Thu Sep 02, 2010 7:32 pm

Check the link eariler in the thread; the rules people ruled that way because the rules are explicit. Wacho even suggests it be sent to the CoE for errata.
Remember, NetRep rulings are official. This does not necessarily mean they are correct.

You probably aren't playing Fallen Wizards .
User avatar
Bandobras Took
Non-voting member
 
Posts: 2309
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:30 pm

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby miguel » Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:02 pm

meccgnetrep (at) gmail (dot) com
User avatar
miguel
Council Member
 
Posts: 655
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 8:21 am

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Shapeshifter » Thu Mar 03, 2011 2:31 pm

User avatar
Shapeshifter
Council Member
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Bandobras Took » Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:22 pm

Playtesting, forsooth. There's no need according to the old or new charters. This has received the majority vote and Thorondor can send it to the mailing list whenever he wants to.

Playtesting? Most people already play this way. They aren't aware of the rule.

But if we must have playtesting, then fine.

Anybody until the end of the month can make decks and test. If anything turns out to be more powerful/broken than playing CM/WHCtK in the site phase, feel free to post it here.

If you don't care enough to playtest this in a month's time, then it obviously didn't matter much, did it?
Remember, NetRep rulings are official. This does not necessarily mean they are correct.

You probably aren't playing Fallen Wizards .
User avatar
Bandobras Took
Non-voting member
 
Posts: 2309
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 2:30 pm

Re: Erratum Proposal: Cards Playable On Automatic Attacks

Postby Sauron » Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:57 pm

User avatar
Sauron
 
Posts: 551
Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:27 pm

Next

Return to CoE Rules & Errata

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron