222-New Characters

Moderator: FATE Development

222-New Characters

Postby dirhaval » Fri May 30, 2014 11:40 pm

I like to make the use of a dark dwarf as a main character for minions.
Either new rules need to be made or a new card will be made.
Below is what I made so far for FATE.

DWARF WARRIOR/SCOUT/SAGE DWARF
[GI: 20; Mind: 8, DI: 3, P/B: 6/8, Home Sites: Angurath]
Unique. Broadbeam. War-lord. Leader. +2 prowess against Orcs. +1 prowess against elves. +4 direct influence against Dwarves. When he is at any Ancient Dwarf-hold, you may keep one more card than normal in your hand. Warlord’s Lair can be played at any of his home sites. Deep Mines can be played adjacent to any of his home sites.
dirhaval
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:39 am

Re: 222-New Characters

Postby dirhaval » Wed Dec 03, 2014 1:31 am

Fankil 10/3/4/9
R/Sa/D demon sp
Unique. Avatar. Fallen-maia. Can use spirit-magic. +2 direct influence against factions. +1 to flattery, riddling, and offering attempts. Cannot be in a company with a size greater than four. Cannot have followers. Player cannot play an avatar without a mind. Must use balrog sites except for his home sites. Home site: Shapôl Udûn.

Rakodsaol 10/4/6/9
W/Sc/Sa demon so
Unique. Avatar. Fallen-maia. Leader. Overt. Can use sorcery. -1 (instead of -3) prowess when not tapping to face a strike. +1 to under-deep movement rolls. Cannot be in a company with a size greater than four. Player cannot play an avatar without a mind.
Must use balrog sites except for his home sites. Home site: Shapôl Udûn.

Demons of the Illuin
Permanent-event.
May be in the starting company in lieu of an item. Your starting company can begin at Shapôl Udûn. The minion darkhaven site of Shapôl Udûn can be used by this player. Two fallen-maia, spawn, or undead avatar with a mind can be in play at the same time by this player. Each avatar with a mind cannot be in a company at a site other than one of their home sites with another avatar with a mind controlled by the same player. Each avatar with a mind is allow to use Iron Crown.



xxxxxxx
Okay. I like to add something new to FATE. This is allowing a player to have two minor avatars in play simultaneously. I got this idea from the fan magazine Hall of Fire.
This is for role playing - not MERP. Someone developed lesser wizards that worked in pairs. I like the idea since it was odd in the books that wizards were well-known. If the Blue Wizards moved East early, then would it not be obvious that only three wizards could be one of these wizards in tales? Yes, there were imposters, sorcerers, and the like that could give wizards a recognized demeanor. Why not lesser wizards? I am using lesser wizards in three pairs in the 64-player Endor game.
I developed two demon avatars for FATE. One could easily ignore this sidetrek to have Ologong be an avatarless player using those neat Warlord-Underdeep resource events.

The strength of these two avatars include:
*two characters immune to corruption,
*two characters with high stats costing no GI
*death of one avatar does not hinder a player as loosing his only avatar

Penalties I have considered:
*restricting company size with a minor avatar
*restricting company composition with other minor avatars

I think that this player will have two companies. One will have Ologong with 9 mind and another with a 4-6 mind minion
so to use 13-15 GI of the 25 GI.

Let me know what you think!
dirhaval
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:39 am

Re: 222-New Characters

Postby Thorsten the Traveller » Wed Dec 10, 2014 8:18 pm

Funny thing this avatar duo, but I'm not sure it adds much to the game. Perhaps for minions it is more natural than for heroes, most minions are Thralls to a higher or lesser degree. Even so, the avatar represents you, the player! So is this something for players with split personality, or identical twins?

And lesser Wizards? hmm, sounds like bad fantasy novels, or not necessarily bad (Pratchett/Goodkind) but at least not very Tolkinesque. Wizards are Maiar, it's not like some went to Wizard school and were kicked out before graduation day. Yes 2 went to the East, but that doesn't mean they operated in a team. It seems unlikely in fact. Thematically it creates more options if they are loners, even if they temporarily team up. Yes there are imposters, tricksters, sorcerers, but should they be avatars?

Anyway, theme aside, what are the benefits? I'm not even sure Demons should make cc's at all. There's need of strong characters costing fewer GI? that can be amended with a card. Why not make them Warlords? Or start with special Warlord cards on them?
So both can tap to access sb? Cards both control can't be influenced away? That seems pretty good. Do you suffer -10 MP if both are killed? Assuming sb access is the main issue with avatar loss (for minions), that too can be amended with a card, see e.g. There Is Always Vengeance.

just my 2x2 cents :-)
Stone-age did not end because man ran out of rocks.
User avatar
Thorsten the Traveller
Chairman
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Tilburg, Netherlands

Re: 222-New Characters

Postby dirhaval » Thu Dec 11, 2014 1:54 am

Thank you for the comments.
Yes, this is odd having two avatars together. I needed another player in the north with so many anyway.
With 32 players this does not need to happen.

I decided to not make them Warlords since I can find direct influence elsewhere.
I was thinking of adopting the RW/Barlog abilities to these demons about corruption, influencing way events...
May be -4 MP if killed?
About tapping for sideboard; I was thinking that an avatar can tap just like an avatar when away from his home site.
Yes, having two avatars does help with playing the game if one is killed, but
that part of the Map is dangerous,
underdeeps are somewhat restricted with harsh AA, Dularch two sites over, and Felagrog near
and since Fankil cannot have followers he must move with others to be safe so Fankil
will be moving regularly and not squat.
The lethal effects of some allies also drove me to these lesser avatars to keep the allies in play.
Another aspect about not making them Warlords was that both were lesser than a balrog.
The 64-player Endor game has two lesser wizards vs. the demons of Illuin,
another pair of lesser wizards vs. the second Court of Ardor Player,
and a third pair of lesser wizards vs. Sauron's Necromancer teacher written by Eric Dubourg.
This then is 8 wizard players for a 64-player game.

So these are the options:
1-keep with some changes
2-make each a Warlord avatar like Aradagor, but loose the concept of lesser wizards in pairs
...The current Demons deck then will have some minor changes since Ologong can hold his own and the
avatar on the surface can change little.
dirhaval
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:39 am

Re: 222-New Characters

Postby Thorsten the Traveller » Sun Dec 21, 2014 6:05 pm

In my experience, any part of the map can be (and is) dangerous :lol:
especially in your FATE game where opponent has a hazard deck more tuned towards a specific opponent.

anyway, how bout making these demons like this: 9 mind (or whatnot) Costs only 4 mind to control unless you have revealed an avatar? These 2 demons for 8 mind, not bad. Chances of being killed by these spawn allies are minimal then.

About the cc's, well that's tricky. I like the idea of demons/spawn/undead not making any cc's, Ringwraith/Balrog belong to this category in a way, but unlike these avatars your Demon characters I suppose can use items and move around freely. This upsets their power balance. We had the same with Leucaruth the Wrathful, she could move around freely (in Withered Heath) and collect 20 CP's worth of items without much problems. So perhaps they should just be exempt of making cc's for resource events. Or, more radical, should not be allowed to use items either. Why is Morgul-blade an event, and not a RW item?...
Stone-age did not end because man ran out of rocks.
User avatar
Thorsten the Traveller
Chairman
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Tilburg, Netherlands

Re: 222-New Characters

Postby dirhaval » Mon Dec 22, 2014 1:50 am

This is good feedback. I was going to write about this after discovering yesterday
about the avatar-Warlord Malezar. I was thinking about him a few years ago, but
decided for two Court of Ardor players. Alas, I rather have Malezar as a player
against Valdacli. Then to move Indur to Imlad Morgul usurping Hoarmurath.
Then the Ice-King moves back to the Illuin Mountains.

In the meantime, I like your idea of reduced mind for control.
For using items maybe create a resource that is attached to the item for use?
This means only three items can be ever be used at one time between the
two demons and room must be made in the deck for the event. Then the
item cannot be transferred to anyone? For the Demons deck I only want the Iron Crown to be used.

A quick update:
I am making Indur's Deck now. Then I will work on the Power decks with time of making the Court of Ardor deck.
The deck is made, but I need to write the summary.
All the new sites in the Uttersouth allow me to make worthy deck there.
dirhaval
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:39 am

Re: 222-New Characters

Postby dirhaval » Mon Apr 20, 2015 12:20 am

I have overcame my dragon-sickness. I was thinking of the Witch-king's deck and saw
the wasted turns playing Ancient Black Axe. He has had this weapon from the genesis of Fate.
So, I moved the weapon to the Demon of Illiun; that is right - singular. Only one avatar
now is for that player in Illuin. The axe's corruption support ability will help the wearer
of Iron Crown. I am playing Witch-King this week. Magic Ring of Fury replaces the axe.
Long ago, the Rogrog had three troll followers with a sum of 8 CP, so the axe was needed. Not anymore.

The Demon of Illuin has the following items: Iron Crown, Hammer of the Under-world, and Ancient Black Axe.
dirhaval
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:39 am


Return to Showcase

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron