charter rewrite: involving the players in the errata process

how to involve the player base in the process of issuing errata on cards/rules?

Poll ended at Mon Apr 11, 2011 12:33 pm

consentive vote by the player base is needed BEFORE any errata process gets started
0
No votes
affirmative vote by the player base is needed in order of making any errata effective
4
67%
both, a consentive AND an affirmative vote by the player base is needed
0
No votes
nothing at all is needed
2
33%
 
Total votes : 6

Re: charter rewrite: involving the players in the errata pro

Postby Vastor Peredhil » Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:15 am

Hi all,

after reading through it all again, I am with Eric on this one, to go with version C,

still I believe the CoE is reasonable enough to have no need of control by the voters out there, as most players will not care one way or the other, we just have the feeling that many might care, as some, such as Brian make a big fuss out of everything we deem worthy of a change

Nicolai
Vastor Peredhil
Council Member
 
Posts: 861
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 10:46 am
Location: Kempen (Niederrhein) Germany

Re: charter rewrite: involving the players in the errata pro

Postby thorondor » Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:06 pm

hmm, thouight i have replied, but there is nothing. probably forgot to submit ...
anyway: i am convinced that C is the best option.
thorondor
Vice-chair
 
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:53 pm
Location: salzburg, austria

Re: charter rewrite: involving the players in the errata pro

Postby marcos » Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:13 pm

i agree: "C"
User avatar
marcos
 
Posts: 2010
Joined: Sun Feb 18, 2007 5:41 pm
Location: Córdoba, Argentina

Re: charter rewrite: involving the players in the errata pro

Postby Jose-san » Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:17 pm

I say "C" because it's the closest thing to "nothing at all".
User avatar
Jose-san
 
Posts: 200
Joined: Sun Jul 20, 2008 2:22 pm
Location: Valencia, Spain

Re: charter rewrite: involving the players in the errata pro

Postby Shapeshifter » Fri Jun 03, 2011 7:06 am

I would like to see a combination of options "B" and "C". Let's go with "B" first. However, if the total number of voters for an erratum proposal would be below a certain number (less than 50?) option "C" could automatically replace option "B" (for this single vote, only). Too complicated? Well, then we should go with "C".
User avatar
Shapeshifter
Council Member
 
Posts: 398
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2007 4:16 pm
Location: Germany

Re: charter rewrite: involving the players in the errata pro

Postby thorondor » Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:40 am

though not all have uttered their opinion we have a clear voting, which is in favour of C.
eric: would you like to add it to the charter-draft?
thorondor
Vice-chair
 
Posts: 598
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 6:53 pm
Location: salzburg, austria

Re: charter rewrite: involving the players in the errata pro

Postby Thorsten the Traveller » Wed Jun 08, 2011 6:37 pm

yep I will edit the current draft then.
Stone-age did not end because man ran out of rocks.
User avatar
Thorsten the Traveller
Chairman
 
Posts: 1499
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:44 pm
Location: Tilburg, Netherlands

Re: charter rewrite: involving the players in the errata pro

Postby Frodo » Sun Jun 12, 2011 7:40 pm

It feels great to see all of this change happening. It reminds me of a quote I show my students:

"the art of progress is to keep change amidst order, and to keep order amidst change."

Frodo
User avatar
Frodo
 
Posts: 501
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 5:09 am
Location: NYC, NY

Previous

Return to Agenda Items

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests

cron